CyberInsecure.com

Archive for the ‘Adobe’ Category

Bugs in iPad applications used by numerous newspapers and magazines to deliver digital content to their paying subscribers, can be exploited to access it for free.

The problems were discovered by a group of Italian hackers called DarkApples and were originally reported [Google translation] in the Italian newspaper Il Post (The Post).

Adobe’s Digital Content Viewer technology, which is used by many publications, including Wired, The New Yorker, iGIZMO, Corriere della Sera or Gazzetta dello Sport, seems to be the most vulnerable one. This extremely simple exploitation method suggests that Adobe’s technology was designed with little regard for security.

According to the hackers, it’s only necessary to edit a settings file (.plist) and change an option from “no” to “yes” in order to turn a publication from purchasable to viewable. Such a modification will cause a “Download” button to appear for a subscription instead of a “Buy” one and will result in users having free access to the content.

In order to edit the .plist file, users need to connect the iPad to a computer and use freely available tools like iPhone Explorer to browse the contents of the device.

Also, while for publications offering long-term subscriptions this is a one-time hack, for others the process might need repeating when new issues are released.

“We have confirmed that it is possible for experienced users with detailed instructions to access some digital publications on the iPad that have not been purchased. We are working on a fix and expect to deliver a new version of our Digital Content Viewer to publishers on Friday, October 8,” Adobe said in a statement.

However, according to the Huffington Post, the hack was still working on Monday. Granted, this might not be Adobe’s fault, as the company only provides the technology. It’s the publishers’ job to update their individual apps and get them out to existent subscribers through whatever mechanisms they have in place for that.

Il Post reports that Adobe’s Digital Content Viewer is not the only technology vulnerable to such attacks. Others have similar bugs, but exploitation requires advanced tools and more technical knowledge.

Credit: Softpedia.com News

Researchers have uncovered sophisticated attack code circulating on the net that exploits a critical vulnerability in the most recent version of Adobe Reader.

The click-and-get-hacked exploit spreads through email that contains a booby-trapped PDF file that remains virtually undetected by most anti-virus programs, according to Mila Parkour, the security researcher who first alerted Adobe to the threat. It was being sent to a small group of individuals who “work on common issues,” he said, causing him to believe they were narrowly selected by the attackers.

Adobe on Wednesday confirmed that the vulnerability affects Reader 9.3.4 and earlier versions for Windows, Mac OS X, and Unix. The company’s security team is in the process of figuring out when it will release a patch. Adobe is working with security companies to help them develop detection and quarantine techniques to contain any attacks.

In the meantime, there are no mitigations users can take other than to exercise due care in opening PDF documents. It may also make sense to use an alternate PDF viewer such as FoxIT, but it’s not yet been confirmed that that other programs aren’t vulnerable.

The malicious PDF, which also exploits Adobe Acrobat, uses some highly sophisticated techniques to ensure success. It contains three separate font packages so it works on multiple versions of the Adobe programs, and it also has been designed to bypass protections such as ASLR, or address space layout randomization and DEP, and data execution prevention, which are built in to more recent versions of Microsoft Windows.

The exploit comes as Adobe is putting the finishing touches on a security feature that’s designed to significantly lessen the severity of attacks that exploit buffer overflows and other types of common bugs in Reader. The “sandbox” is intended to put a container around the application so that sensitive parts of the operating system can’t be accessed by rogue code. Adobe has said it will be available by the end of this year.

Active exploits are likely to become more widespread once the attack code is put into Metasploit.

Credit: The Register

Security researchers from Websense warn that over one hundred websites hosted at Media Temple (mt) have been injected with rogue code that lead visitors to a potent Web exploitation kit. The toolkit targets a dozen vulnerabilities in older versions of Flash Player, Adobe Reader, Internet Explorer or Java Runtime.

The mass compromise was detected by Websense’s ThreatSeeker Network, and even though the affected websites are hosted at Media Temple, this does not imply any security problems with the hosting company’s servers or infrastructure. Similarly to other hosting providers, Media Temple has had its share of compromised websites under its roof in the past and this is because hackers systematically scan entire address spaces for vulnerable targets, before proceeding to infect them.

A large number of the websites compromised in this latest attack (46%) are running WordPress, but again, this does not suggest any unpatched vulnerability in the popular blogging platform. The Websense security researchers note that most likely the injections are the result of flaws in outdated third party software.

The rogue code added to the compromised websites is obfuscated JavaScript, generates and directs users to one of malicious malicious URLs. “Using the algorithm [...], we generated 64 URLs […] and find there are 2 different scripts. One is very simple with an anti-bot trick so it won’t be crawled by search engines. […] The other is highly obfuscated, and finally redirects to an exploit kit called Phoenix,” the Websense experts explain.

An exploit kit is a collection of exploits for vulnerabilities affecting various applications that are usually found on most people’s computers. At the moment, the Phoenix kit targets two flaws in Adobe Flash Player, five in Adobe Reader, three in Internet Explorer and two in the Java Runtime Environment, however, these could change in the future.

In order to stay protected from such threats users are advised to always keep their applications up to date and run a capable antivirus program on their computers. Free specialized programs like the Personal Software Inspector (PSI) from Secunia, can monitor most programs installed on a computer and alert the owner as soon as any updates for them are available.

Credit: Softpedia.com News

Adobe warns users that an unpatched vulnerability affecting Flash Player, Reader and Acrobat is actively being exploited in the wild. The critical flaw allows attackers to remotely execute arbitrary code.

The vulnerability affects the latest stable releases of Flash Player 10.0.x and 9.0.x, as well as any older versions, for all supported operating systems – Windows, Mac and UNIX. The company notes that the latest release candidate for the upcoming Flash Player 10.1 is not affected and advises users to upgrade to it:

Affected Versions

- Adobe Flash Player 10.0.45.2, 9.0.262, and earlier 10.0.x and 9.0.x versions for Windows, Macintosh, Linux and Solaris
- Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.3.2 and earlier 9.x versions for Windows, Macintosh and UNIX

Not Vulnerable

- Flash Player 10.1 Release Candidate
- Adobe Reader and Acrobat 8.x

The bug also affects the latest versions of Adobe Reader and Acrobat through the authplay.dll library included in these products. This component is used to play SWFs embedded in PDF documents and has been affected by a similar vulnerability in July last year. Adobe proposes that this file be renamed, deleted or denied access to, until a fix becomes available.

“This vulnerability (CVE-2010-1297) could cause a crash and potentially allow an attacker to take control of the affected system. There are reports that this vulnerability is being actively exploited in the wild against both Adobe Flash Player, and Adobe Reader and Acrobat,” is announced in Adobe’s Security Advisory on the issue. “Adobe Reader and Acrobat 8.x are confirmed not vulnerable,” the company also informs.

Adobe products have been plagued by many zero-day remote code execution vulnerabilities in recent years, which earned the company a bad image with security-conscious users. To make it easier for system administrators in large companies to deploy security updates, in June last year Adobe introduced a quarterly patching cycle aligned with Microsoft’s Patch Tuesday. However, because of critical bugs discovered in the wild, the company was forced to release out-of-band updates two times already, and it looks like this latest vulnerability might call for a third one.

Credit: Softpedia.com News

Miscreants have begun creating malware that overwrites software update applications from Adobe and others. Email malware that poses as security updates from trusted companies is a frequently used hacker ruse. Malware posing as update utilities, rather than individual updates, represents a new take on the ruse.

Vietnam-based anti-virus firm Bkis said the tactic is a logical follow-on from earlier approaches where viruses replace system-files and startup-program files.

Nguyen Minh Duc, director of Bkis Security, writes that the recently detected Fakeupver trojan establishes a backdoor on compromised systems while camouflaging its presence by posing as an Adobe update utility. The malware camouflages itself by using the same icons and version number as the official package.

Variants of the malware also pose as updaters for Java and other software applications.

Duc explains: “From analysis, we found that malware is written in Visual Basic, faking such popular programs as Adobe, DeepFreeze, Java, Windows, etc. In addition, on being executed, they immediately turn on the following services: DHCP client, DNS client, Network share and open port to receive hacker’s commands.”

Credit: The Register

A researcher has unearthed a bug in software used to install Adobe’s ubiquitous Reader and Flash applications that can be exploited to remotely install malicious files on end user PCs.

The Adobe Download Manager is an ActiveX script that is invoked when people install or update Reader or Flash using Internet Explorer. Researcher Aviv Raff has figured out how to exploit it to install any file he wishes simply by tricking a user into clicking on a link on the Adobe.com domain.

The attack combines a vulnerability on Adobe’s website with a defect in the download manager. The result: he was able to install and execute his own instance of the Windows calculator on a Register test machine. Aviv demonstrated the exploit on the condition further technical details be withheld.

“Instead of admitting that this design flaw is indeed a problem which can be abused by malicious attackers, Adobe decided to downplay this issue,” Raff wrote. He was referring to unpublished comments an Adobe spokeswoman made to Zero Day blogger Ryan Naraine.

In part, the comments said the download manager “is designed to remove itself from the computer after use at the next restart,” “can only be used to download the latest version of software hosted on Adobe.com,” and “presents a very large user dialog box when downloading software.”

But because the download manager remains on a machine until it is rebooted, attackers have ample opportunity to exploit the bug. Assuming the typical machine is restarted once every 24 to 72 hours, attacks have a reasonable chance of success as long as they are launched within the first one to three days of a recent update. (We’re guessing a fair percentage of people would be unfazed by the dialog box).

And once that happens, attackers have the ability to remotely install malicious code on an untold millions of PCs.

In response to Raff’s post, Adobe spokeswoman Wiebke Lips wrote: “Adobe is aware of the recently posted report of a remote code execution vulnerability in the Adobe Download Manager. We are working with the researcher, Aviv Raff, and the third party vendor of this component to investigate and resolve the issue as quickly as possible.”

The myriad bugs that over the past few years have routinely imperiled the entire internet have made Adobe the Toyota of the software industry. Company security personnel seem intent of correcting the problems, but the only way for that to happen is to launch a comprehensive initiative that makes a top-to-bottom review of the company’s entire code base.

Credit: The Register

A rare emergency update from Microsoft to patch a critical vulnerability in Internet Explorer will be released on Thursday. Critical patches for Adobe Systems software keep coming. This time, they fix serious security bugs in the company’s Shockwave Player. Apple has also released a major security update designed to fix security bugs, some of which present a critical security risk on unpatched systems.

Microsoft update will mark only the 10th 12th time Microsoft has issued a security update outside of its normal schedule since 2003, when it began issuing patches on the second Tuesday of each month. It will come a week after the world learned an attack exploiting the potent IE flaw was used to pierce the defenses of Google and at least some of the other 33 large companies that suffered similar assaults.

Microsoft researchers said that they continue to see only limited attacks that exploit the bug and that, so far, they have only succeed against IE 6. But, as reported Tuesday, researchers elsewhere said they have figured out how to bypass security measures offered in later versions of the widely used browser, making it theoretically possible to compromise a much broader base of PCs.

Microsoft said the emergency patch will be issued as close to 10 am Seattle time as possible and will contain fixes for several other vulnerabilities as well. The company recommends users install it as soon as possible. The patch will require users to restart their machines.

For the first time, Microsoft said the vulnerability could also be exploited to attack users of its email and office productivity software. Thursday’s patch will close holes in those programs as well. Users of Microsoft Access, Word, Excel, or PowerPoint can workaround the issue by disabling ActiveX Controls.

Adobe is strongly urging users to upgrade. Unlike the vast majority of patches, the Shockwave fix requires users manually uninstall the out-of-date version, reboot their systems, and then install the latest version. For an application with more than 450 million installations, that’s downright primitive.

More importantly, making it inconvenient for users to upgrade is a guarantee that a sizable portion of them will remain vulnerable. Adobe has recently unveiled an automatic updater for its Reader application. It’s about time the software maker made seamless updating for Flash and Shockwave standard too. The critical patch, assuming it’s installed, will update Shockwave to version 11.5.6.606.

Patches released by Apple on Tuesday address a malware injection risk in the CoreAudio media player, Flash Player plug-in bugs and a similarly critical vulnerability involving Image Raw. The update also tackles a recently discovered OpenSSL renegotiation exploit. Security fixes for CUPS and Image IO make up the remainder of the patch batch.

Most of these updates are connected with third party software. For example, seven of the twelve CVEs are connected with the update for Adobe’s flash player plug-in. The remainder of the bugs are the usual file format parsing problems that we’ve seen a lot of in the past.

Apple advisory can be found at http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4004.

Credit: The Register

Microsoft published an advisory today about a critical security vulnerability in all versions of Internet Explorer (apart from version 5). While all versions of Internet Explorer are affected, the risk for everyone running Internet Explorer 8 is lower since it has DEP (Data Execution Prevention) enabled by default.

According to McAfee, hackers who breached the defenses of Google, Adobe Systems and at least 32 other companies used this vulnerability to carry out at least some of the attacks.

The previously unknown flaw in the IE browser was probably just one of the vectors used in the attacks, McAfee CTO George Kurtz wrote in a blog post. Using a sophisticated spear-phishing campaign, the perpetrators included malicious links exploiting the bug in emails and instant messages sent to employees from at least three of the targeted companies.

Contrary to previous speculation, there was no evidence vulnerabilities in Adobe’s Reader or Acrobat applications were used in any of the attacks, Kurtz said. In its own statement, adobe concurred, saying researchers “have not been able to obtain any evidence to indicate that Adobe Reader or other Adobe technologies were used as the attack vector in this incident.”

Kurtz said his findings were based on malware samples taken from “three to five” of the targeted companies and he stressed that other zero days or exploits could have been used against other victims.

“In our investigation we discovered that one of the malware samples involved in this broad attack exploits a new, not publicly known vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Explorer,” Kurtz wrote. “Our investigation has shown that Internet explorer is vulnerable on all of Microsoft’s most recent operating system releases, including Windows 7.”

Shortly after the report, Microsoft confirmed the new IE vulnerability was “one of the vectors used in targeted and sophisticated attacks against Google and possibly other corporate networks.” A company statement said the attacks were carried out against version 6 of the widely used browser and suggested users protect themselves by enabling security features that have been added to successor versions.

McAfee’s report is the latest to shed light on one of the most significant cyberattacks in years. Google first disclosed the “highly sophisticated and targeted attack” on Tuesday, saying it originated in China and targeted its intellectual property. It added that 20 other companies suffered similar assaults, a number that independent researchers soon raised to 34. So far, only Google and Adobe have been identified as victims.

Yahoo, Symantec, Northrop Grumman and Dow Chemical have also been penetrated according to The Washington Post, citing unnamed “congressional and industry sources.”

The malware that McAfee researchers analyzed was sent to a highly select group of employees of a handful of companies that Kurtz declined to identify.

“This wasn’t something that got blasted to 300,000 people in a corporation,” Kurtz said in an interview with The Register. “It was really targeted at senior technology leaders that had access to core pieces of intellectual property, source code, et cetera.”

Kurtz has dubbed the attack “Aurora,” a reference to the filepath on the attacker’s machine that showed up in some of the malware code McAfee researchers analyzed. They believe that is the name the attackers gave to the operation. There was nothing in the binaries that indicated either way whether the code writers spoke Cantonese or Mandarin or were located in China.

The IE vulnerability stems from an invalid pointer reference that when exploited allows an attacker to execute malicious shell code on underlying machines. The malware caused exploited machines to download further malicious scripts that installed a backdoor. The machines then connected to command and control channels that were hosted on servers that resided in the US and Taiwan.

A security feature known as data execution prevention, which prevents data loaded into memory from being executed, will block the particular exploits McAfee has observed. But Kurtz warned the vulnerability exists in all versions of IE except for IE 5.01, service pack 4, and that it would be possible for attackers to work around the protection.

In an advisory, Microsoft recommended people use DEP, which by default is enabled in IE 8 but must be turned on in prior versions. The statement also advised users on Vista and later versions of Windows to run IE in protected mode. The advisory didn’t say when an update would be released that patches the vulnerability.

Credit: The Register, SANS ISC

A security researcher has identified more than 8 million Adobe Flash files that make the websites hosting them vulnerable to attacks that target visitors with malicious code.

The Flash files are contained on a wide variety of sites operated by online casinos, news organizations, banks, and professional sports teams. They make the pages where they reside susceptible to XSS, or cross-site scripting, attacks that have the potential to inject malicious code and content into a visitor’s browser and in some cases steal credentials used to authenticate user accounts.

The researcher, who goes by the moniker MustLive, said the Flash files contain poorly written ActionScript used to count the number of times a banner has been clicked and typically contain the clickTAG or url parameters. Google searches identified a total more than 8.3 million of them on sites hosted by the New York Giants football team, Praguepost.com and ParadaisPoker.com. Because Google results are often abbreviated, the actual number is probably higher.

MustLive said websites that host the buggy content aren’t automatically vulnerable to XSS exploits. Indeed, even though the pages on the official Citibank website included such content, XSS attacks that tried to exploit them failed.

But the researcher provided a wealth of examples of websites that were made vulnerable by the Adobe files, which provide graphics that move and are often referred to as SWFs, because of the three-letter suffix their file names carry.

It’s by no means the first time someone has identified a sprawling body of SWF files that threaten the security of the sites hosting them. Two years ago, researchers documented serious vulnerabilities in Adobe-based content that exposed more than 10,000 sites to attack.

The threat was particularly difficult to eradicate because webmasters had to patch their content-generation software and then render the animation scripts all over again. Months after the problem was identified, many websites still hadn’t bothered to take action.

Last year, MustLive reported 215,000 vulnerable Flash files, a number he later raised to the millions. That content was also made vulnerable by buggy ActionScript.

It should be said that the vulnerabilities exposed in the latest discovery are the result of bugs introduced by sloppy rendering, rather than vulnerable Adobe software. Adobe provides security guidance for designing banners with tracking capabilities.

Credit: The Register

Adobe is investigating reports of unpatched flaws in its Reader and Acrobat software packages. Zero-day bugs in Adobe Reader and Acrobat have reportedly been exploited by hackers to attack vulnerable systems, in a series of limited (presumably) targeted attacks since 11 December. Adobe Reader and Acrobat 9.2 or below are potentially vulnerable to attacks. Successful exploitation creates a means for hackers to inject hostile code onto vulnerable systems, security notification firm Secunia warns.

Adobe has posted a holding statement on its security blog, saying that it is investigating the flaw. It’s unclear when a patch might become available.

Shadowserver suggests disabling JavaScript as a workaround, pending the availability of a patch from Adobe.

The latest security problem for Adobe follows the release of a patch for Flash and AIR addressing a previously unpatched vulnerability, released last week. Adobe is planning to publish a patch for a zero-day flaw in Illustrator on 8 January.

The popularity of Adobe software has made it a favoured target for hacking attacks over recent months. Booby-trapped PDF files have become as commonplace as browser exploits in hacking attacks. Part of the problem for this may be that applying Adobe updates is fiddlier and more time consuming than applying Microsoft fixes or patching browser exploits. Vulnerable ActiveX components can easily get left behind during updates, for example.

Credit: The Register

P.S. Whoever still uses Adobe Reader and Acrobat deserves to be hacked. With the amount of alternatives, there is no reason why Adobe products for PDF should not be uninstalled in the next 2 minutes.